headerphoto

Macau Business

To arrive and take over the market. Those are the plans of GCA President and CEO. How? Simple, says Kirk Sanford. Because local banks will not be able to compete with their services and products. Oh, yes! And because that is what they did everywhere else.



Macau can be a difficult market. How confident are you that this new service - that can produce a small revolution on the casino floors - will be a bet that you already won?
Kirk Sanford -
If history is any indication of our success, we have proven as a model here in the US, in major markets like Las Vegas and Atlantic City. We do business today with the who’s who of the industry, so we have established a market place here in the US, we have taken that same model and have moved it to other countries like the United Kingdom.
There is one fundamental premise in all the markets that we serve, which is that all gaming transactions are initiated and settled in cash. You have to have cash to play. So, because there’s always a need for cash there’s always going to be a need to access that cash and that’s when we come in.
Debit cards are common around the world, people use them not only to get cash from ATM’s but also to make purchases. Today, China is one of the fastest growing credit card markets. We think there’s a phenomenal opportunity to happen to the credit card side of the business. Cheques are not so common as they are here, but we also have credit bureau services.  So for casinos that wish to extend credit to high- rollers they can access our worldwide data-base. Every casino in the world that extends credit to gaming patrons relies on our services today, including in Macau. Sands and Wynn uses the credit bureau services. We are still learning, we started working on Macau more than one year ago, it is taking us more time than what we expected because it’s a different market.

Cautious approach

Do you worry, since both markets are so different, that your services in Macau will not succeed as much?
I wouldn’t say that. There are some risks that we don’t know about. We are going to be cautious in our approach, we are going to do things the right way and, to use a game term, let the chips fall where they may. There is a market today for people providing standard ATM machines, credit card cash advance is happening there today, we think we can do it better. Our business model is pretty simple, anywhere where we have gone is delivering the value proposition  that is better than what the competition offers. So, where that competition is here in the US, in Europe or in Macau we think we are positioned from a product stand point. This is the only business we service that is allowing patrons to access cash for gaming entertainment.

You are an American company, there are three major American gaming operators in Macau, some of which are your clients here in the US, yet your first agreement was with Galaxy…
When we made a decision to go into Macau, early on, we decided to move in a direction where we were going to deliver a value proposition consistent with everyone else that was there. We later came back to the conclusion that we would not go that path, that we would do things differently, to adapt the technologies that we have and as a result it took us about eight to nine months longer that what we had originally planned. As a result to that delay we missed the opening of Wynn, in particular, which is one of our clients here in Las Vegas. Because of the types of partnerships that we have and the trusted partner that we are viewed as, we were forthright and candid with the client that we were not ready to go to the market. They had opened and had to have a service provider and as a result they have one of the local banks there. We think that we are not too far away from delivering the same types of technologies and service levels that we offer in the US.

And to grab the same market share in Macau that you have in the US or even trying to take over the market as you did in the UK?
We certainly would like to have everybody as a partner. If we do things right, as we’ve done in the past, I think we will be very successful. These technologies took us years to build. Some of the existing banks will need time to change the infrastructure so they can focus on a very small market. So, at the end of the day they are going to come back with the conclusion that to spend the resources, the technology, and investing in the services infrastructure for this niche market does not pay.

Today Macau, tomorrow Asia

I see Macau as very exciting for you, growing at such a high level, with so many more casinos to open. But not that far away other gaming jurisdictions are opening, like Singapore, expanding, like South Korea, thinking of opening, like Japan. Are you thinking of entering the whole region?
We do. I think the first step is delivering all our commitments to the Macau market. If we are successful in doing that we are confident that we can take the same model and apply it to the other jurisdictions that you have mentioned. And the benefit that we have, again, is that a number of the US casino operator relationships would allow that opportunity to happen for us. But Macau is a very important market for us, we are very excited about it and hopefully we are going to prove to Macau operators and the gaming patrons that what we do is better, follows all the legal [criteria] and the compliance [laws] and all the other things that need to be done in order to do business right.

In 2006 your company had almost US 600 million dollars in profits. The first quarter of this year reached 150 million dollars. And GCA is only ten years old. How come nobody else succeeded to figure this formula?
Did I know or have the confidence that you could make a business out of providing cash access services to gaming patrons? Yes, I was confident since the beginning. There were a lot of people that were skeptical, there was a fragment in the market, banks that were providing certain types of services and credit card providers. They had already established business models. But why not bring them all together and be a true one stop solution? It was very logical to my mind. And then, if we continue to innovate, to establish great technology partners, success would be garaunteed in such a unique environment like the casino one. We did prove ourselves.

When you started, however, you needed to compete with an environment that was already established, banks were providing some services. How did you find a way to convince the gaming operators?
Ninety percent was ignorance and a desire to do it. I didn’t know what value met. When now I look back, sometimes I question myself how did it all come together. But it did because when you look to all the pieces of the business, it is logical. It makes perfect sense. If somebody would tell me no I would ask why, and I kept asking why. Kept innovating, kept finding what the operators and the gaming patrons wanted and did it better and different than anybody else.

“We don’t want a compulsive patron”

Your services facilitate gaming patrons to access more and more credit. Which is good and bad. They can continue to play because have other means to get cash but this could have social impacts. What can you do to prevent its negative impacts?
Absolutely. Gaming is entertainment for adults and at some point people have to take responsibility for their own actions. Having said that, I also believe that we can play a role to discourage somebody who may not be making an informed decision at the time. We want to do the right thing. There are a small percentage of people that do have an issue with compulsive gambling. We do not want that patron, do not want to make money from that patron.
This is a service that is meant for convenience and access cash for a responsible gaming patron to enjoy the entertainment. And that is the end of it.

You have a partnership with Wing Hang bank. Do you expect other banks to join you in the future or will you maintain this exclusive alliance on your growth plans in Asia?
That is what we are committed to do. They have been fantastic partners. At this point we have no intentions to look outside of that partnership unless there is a market we can’t serve. I’m confident that they have what we need.